Jolly george verghese v. bank of cochin
NettetJolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin, Supreme Court of India, 4 February 1980 India Case-law Other topics relating to IHL Internal legal order Date: 04.02.1980 … NettetJolly George Verghese v. The Bank Of Cochin - Decision of 04 NonePages: 8year: 2024/2024 8 pages 2024/2024None Rawalpenta Venkalu and Ors vs The State of Hyderab S 550134 COM246216 NonePages: 5year: 2024/2024 5 pages 2024/2024None 202424 31 - Research article NonePages: 5year: 2024/2024 5 pages 2024/2024None Practice …
Jolly george verghese v. bank of cochin
Did you know?
NettetHere is an appeal by judgment-debtors the appellants -whose personal freedom is in peril because a court warrant for arrest and detention in the civil prison is chasing them for … Nettet8. aug. 2024 · Jolly George Verghese v. The Bank of Cochin, A law stating imprisonment of a person who fails to repay a debt was valid by the Apex Court. It is worthy to note that the said validity was against the United Nation Convention. Therefore, the Supreme Court analysed this law drawn by the legislature and gave its verdict.
NettetUntitled - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. NettetAbout Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms
NettetSita Ram v. State of U.P MANU/SC/0244/1979 Mention Hussainara Khatoon, I v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna MANU/SC/0121/1979 Mention Jolly George Verghese v. The Bank of Cochin MANU/SC/0014/1980 Mention Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of Jammu and Kashmir MANU/SC/0079/1980 Mentioned Francis Coralie Mullin v. Nettet12. sep. 2024 · The judgment-debtors (appellants) suffered a decree against them in O.S. No. 57 of 1972 in a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs, the respondent-bank being the decree-holder. There are two other money decrees against the appellants (in O.S. 92 of 1972 and 94 of 1974), the total sum payable by them being over Rs. 7 lakhs.
Nettet10. jan. 2024 · Article 11- protects the individual against breach of contract, in Jolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin, AIR 1980 [11], it was held by the Supreme Court that to cast a person in prison because of his poverty and consequent inability to meet his contractual liability is a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution.
NettetThe judgment-debtors (appellants) suffered a decree against them in O.S. No. 57 of 1972 in a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs, the respondent-bank being the decree-holder. There are two other money decrees against the appellants (in O.S. 92 of 1972 and 94 of 1974), the total sum payable by them being over Rs. 7 lakhs. godefroy instant eyebrow peroxideNettet5. jan. 2024 · George Verghese v. The Bank of Cochin 19 , were a law which stated that there would be imprisonment in case a person fails to repay a debt was held to be valid by the Supreme Court despite it being against the United Nation Convention. Therefore, the Supreme Court analysed the law as laid down by the legislature and gave the decision. bonspeed77Nettet29. feb. 2024 · The question of whether the treaties are automatically binding or whether they require legislation to do so was resolved in the ruling of the Honourable Supreme … godefroy irrigationNettet30. jul. 2024 · July 30, 2024 Jolly George Verghese & Anr vs The Bank Of Cochin Bench: Justice V.R. Krishnaiyer and Justice R.S. Pathak Appellant: Jolly George … bon spa thai paris 11Nettet14. jun. 2024 · The Supreme Court declined to strike down the provision allowing for civil imprisonment as unconstitutional for being violative of India’s international obligations in the case of Jolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin. bons pcr testNettetI am persuaded by the dicta of by Krishna Iyer, J. in Jolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin, (1980) 2 SCC 360; 1980 AIR 470, 1980 SCR (2) 913 where he stated that; The simple default to discharge is not enough. godefroy isabelleNettetYou need to enable JavaScript to run this app. godefroy jean claude